Slideshow image


Since your web browser does not support JavaScript, here is a non-JavaScript version of the image slideshow:

slideshow image


slideshow image


slideshow image


slideshow image


slideshow image


Why Fact-check? Why preserve a visual record?

The Website Written as a Book
Introduction
1: Science vs Subjective Viewpoints
2: Toward Accurate Collapse Histories
....2.1: Progressive Floor Collapses in the WTC Towers
....2.2: General Global Characteristics of Collapses
....2.3: WTC1 Accurate Collapse History
....2.4: WTC2 Accurate Collapse History
....2.5: WTC7 Accurate Collapse History
3: WTC Collapse Misrepresentations
....3.1: Purpose of the NIST Reports
....3.2: NIST WTC1 Misrepresentations
....3.3: NIST WTC7 Misrepresentations
....3.4: NIST WTC2 Misrepresentations
....3.5: Reviewing the Purpose of NIST and FEMA Reports
....3.6: Bazant Misrepresentation of Collapse Progressions
....3.7: Block Misrepresentations of Collapse Progressions
....3.8: AE911T Misrepresentations of the Collapses
4: Scientific Institutions Can Be Unaware of Contradiction
5: Reassessing the Question of Demolition
....5.1: The Case of WTC1
....5.2: The Case of WTC2
....5.3: The Case of WTC7
6: Collapses Misrepresented as a False Choice
7: Testing the Thesis for Validity
Conclusions

WTC Twin Towers Collapse Dynamics

Official Attempts to Explain Collapses

Academic Attempts to Explain Collapses Reviewed

WTC Video Record

WTC Photographic Record
WTC1 Attack to Collapse
WTC2 Attack to Collapse
WTC 7
.
-----PHOTO RECORD OF FIRE PROGRESSION-----
Fire Progression, WTC1 North Face
Fire Progression, WTC1 South Face
Fire Progression, WTC1 East Face
Fire Progression, WTC1 West Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 North Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 South Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 East Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 West Face
.
----DEBRIS LAYOUT AND CONDITION, BY REGION-----
Debris: WTC1 Around Footprint
Debris: WTC2 Around Footprint
Debris: From WTC1 Westward
Debris: From WTC1 Northward
Debris: From WTC2 Eastward
Debris: From WTC2 Southward
Debris: Plaza Area, Northeast Complex
Debris: Hilton Hotel, Southwest Complex
Debris: General, Unidentified Locations
Damage to Surrounding Buildings
Perimeter Column Photo Record
Perimeter Columns: Types of Damage
Core Box Columns: Types of Damage
Complete Photo Archive
Other Major 9-11 Photo Archives

WTC Structural Information

Log In
Username

Password

Remember Me



Online Misrepresentations of the WTC Collapses

Forum and Blog Records on the WTC Collapses

The Book Tested Through Experiments

Miscellaneous Notes, Resources

JREF 9-11 Forum

JREF 9-11 Forum






This is my JREF posting history in these same subjects from 2010 to the present:

May 11, 2010: OOS Collapse Model thread that branched into this thread

and

October 26, 2010: WTC 1 Feature List, WTC 2 Feature List merged

These last 2 threads were merged together and moved out of the 9-11 sub-forum.


And a follow-up thread here:

Major_Tom Disproves NIST Claims in a Number of Key Areas

I have 3 years of examples which show how many JREF posters handle technical discussions. Many have no history of having an informed, fact-based technical discussion in those threads over a 3 year period.




The Femr video analysis thread also shows how many JREF posters handle technical discussions. He has been explaining the same graphs for 2 years.

Discussion of femr's video data analysis





I'd prefer technical discussion, but I got to see in detail how many of the posters view the NIST reports instead. I got a chance to see how many people respond to information. Anything surprising? No, it is pretty much what I expected to see.

The threads are mostly psychological in nature. I originally intended to have technical discussions, but the same psychological themes kept resurfacing (page after page). Any efforts at some type of discussion which is technical in nature was consistently interrupted by this deep-seated psychological need to support the claims made in the reports by any means necessary.

Why this is so is understandable. The NIST reports are the centerpiece of a belief in technical certainty and the valid application of scientific technical reasoning with respect to the WTC collapse events.


I would not have known how vitally important these reports are to various people unless I experienced the discussions personally over a prolonged period of time. My first reaction would be to assume these convictions are some sort of joke. It was only after prolonged exposure that I realized how serious this need actually is.





The forum can be found here

Created on 05/01/2009 08:22 PM by admin
Updated on 05/23/2013 02:59 PM by admin
 Printable Version

Copyright © 2008 WiredTech, LLC
phpWebSite is licensed under the GNU LGPL