Slideshow image


Since your web browser does not support JavaScript, here is a non-JavaScript version of the image slideshow:

slideshow image


slideshow image


slideshow image


slideshow image


slideshow image


Why Fact-check? Why preserve a visual record?

The Website Written as a Book
Introduction
1: Science and Subjective Viewpoints
2: Toward Accurate Collapse Histories
....2.1: Progressive Floor Collapses in the WTC Towers
....2.2: General Global Characteristics of Collapses
....2.3: Mathematical Basis of ROOSD Propagation
....2.4: WTC1 Accurate Collapse History
....2.5: WTC2 Accurate Collapse History
....2.6: WTC7 Accurate Collapse History
3: WTC Collapse Misrepresentations
....3.1: Purpose of the NIST Reports
....3.2: NIST WTC1 Misrepresentations
....3.3: NIST WTC7 Misrepresentations
....3.4: NIST WTC2 Misrepresentations
....3.5: Reviewing the Purpose of NIST and FEMA Reports
....3.6: Bazant Misrepresentation of Collapse Progressions
....3.7: Block Misrepresentations of Collapse Progressions
....3.8: AE911T Misrepresentations of the Collapses
4: Scientific Institutions Can Be Unaware of Contradiction
5: Reassessing the Question of Demolition
....5.1: The Case of WTC1
....5.2: The Case of WTC2
....5.3: The Case of WTC7
6: WTC Collapse Records Studied as Meme Replication
....6.1: Meme Replication in Technical Literature
....6.2: Meme Replication in Mass Media
....6.3: Meme Replication in Popular Culture
....6.4: John Q Public and the WTC Collapse Records
Conclusions

WTC Twin Towers Collapse Dynamics

Official, Legal Attempts to Explain Collapses

Academic Attempts to Explain Collapses Reviewed

On the Limits of Science and Technology

WTC Video Record

WTC Photographic Record
WTC1 Attack to Collapse
WTC2 Attack to Collapse
WTC 7
.
-----PHOTO RECORD OF FIRE PROGRESSION-----
Fire Progression, WTC1 North Face
Fire Progression, WTC1 South Face
Fire Progression, WTC1 East Face
Fire Progression, WTC1 West Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 North Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 South Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 East Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 West Face
.
----DEBRIS LAYOUT AND CONDITION, BY REGION-----
Debris: WTC1 Around Footprint
Debris: WTC2 Around Footprint
Debris: From WTC1 Westward
Debris: From WTC1 Northward
Debris: From WTC2 Eastward
Debris: From WTC2 Southward
Debris: Plaza Area, Northeast Complex
Debris: Hilton Hotel, Southwest Complex
Debris: General, Unidentified Locations
Damage to Surrounding Buildings
Perimeter Column Photo Record
Perimeter Columns: Types of Damage
Core Box Columns: Types of Damage
Complete Photo Archive
Other Major 9-11 Photo Archives
The 911Dataset Project

WTC Structural Information

Log In
Username

Password

Remember Me



Online Misrepresentations of the WTC Collapses

Forum, Blog Representations of the WTC Collapses

The Book Tested Through Experiments

Miscellaneous Notes, Resources
FAQ for Miscellaneous Notes
History Commons 9/11 Timeline
The 911Dataset Project
Skyscraper Safety Campaign
First and Largest 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Key Words in Book and Website
Trapped Within a Narrowed False Choice
Vulnerability and Requestioning
On Memes and Memetics
Obedience, Conformity and Mental Structure
Denial, Avoidance (Taboo) and Mental Structure
Taboos Against Reviewing the Collapse Events
Extreme Situations and Mental Structure
Suggestibility, Hypnosis and Mental Structure
Awareness and Behavior
Magical, Religious, Scientific Cause-Effect Relations
The Extreme Limits of Mental Dysfunction
Orwell's "Crimestop", "Doublethink", "Blackwhite"
William James, Max Born: Science as Philosophy
Plato on Self Reflection and Mental Structure
Rewriting History, part 1
Rewriting History, part 2
On Smart Idiots

New Ideas in Education

Measurements of Antenna and North Perimeter Tilting

Measurements of Antenna and North Perimeter Tilting

Visual inspection of tilt using synchronized videos from different viewpoints.



Using synchronized videos and the naked eye we can determine that the following two images represent the moment when the NW corner has clearly failed. It is a conservative estimate favoring more tilt, not less:



which represents 0:32 in the synchronized video:
http://www.youtube.com/user/femr2?&MMN_position=312:312#p/u/3/_lnHn9yN6Is

Tilt angle over the initial column failure shown as a 3 image gif here




which represents 0:21 in the synchronized video:
http://www.youtube.com/user/femr2?&MMN_position=312:312#p/u/5/zaB7NJdtVic


These two images show the true state of tilt just after the moment that the last columns failed on the NW corner of the building. In the lower picture the NW corner has already failed at fl 98. The break on the corner is already visible so this image is a conservative estimate of true tilt. Precise measurements will actually yield less tilt than is shown in the images.

If columns on one side of the building are buckling/failing and columns on the other side of the tower are bending but not buckling, the building is still in the process of tilting during the failure sequence. The building tilted to the south and east so the last columns to fail were along the NW corner.


Notice that the tilt angles are such that the true tilt of vertical features as all core and perimeter columns failed was within 1 degree.

Measurements which utilize subpixel tracking are necessary at the moment the NW corner fails to determine the tilt more accurately, but the images above confirm the angle will be quite small, around 1 degree of tilt or less.


As seen along the west face, the SW corner and the NW corner fail at about the same time:



Visual inspection of tilt from the west


CNN clip from the west:
http://www.youtube.com/user/femr2?&MMN_position=312:312#p/u/94/b_f3d-gETnk



The NW corner fail visibly begins to fall downwards at the 0:03 mark. It is already in visible downward motion at this moment:



Actual drop data will reveal even less of a tilt since it can be used to identify the exact set of frames when failure of the NW corner begins.



Determining the moment of failure of the NW corner using subpixel tracking


The failure of the NW corner can be clearly seen in available videos:



Drop and velocity graphs of the NW corner from the Sauret viewpoint:



The y-axis is marked in feet. The x-axis is time, marked in seconds. The velocity curve is not scaled along the y-axis. The velocity is drawn over the drop position curve to compare the shapes of the curves and the slope transitions in the drop position graph. Please look at the y axis resolution. The first "speed-bump" (green line) happens after about 2 ft of falling. The yellow region covers the first 1.5 ft of falling

If hinged tilt existed evidence for it would be seen in the slope of the velocity curve in the yellow region. There would be a slow transition of the slope of the velocity curve over the region of hinged tilt for the duration of the tilt.

The slope changes from no acceleration to an acceleration between 0.5 and 0.8g very quickly. Hinged rotation cannot be seen as 0.5 to 0.8g downward acceleration from the Sauret viewpoint in the yellow region.

Velocity slopes consistent with hinged rotation of more than 1 degree do not exist in the yellow region. The sharp transition of acceleration in the yellow region and the straightness of the velocity slope over the first 2 ft of falling confirms that the NW corner tilted only slightly before failing completely.

Also notice that after each speed-bump (each green line), the slope of the velocity curve returns to about the same value. This slope is the acceleration. The value of that slope returns to the same value after each collision.

Note the tilt when the NW corner fails. By thye time you see an ejection from the NW corner, the corner had already failed:





Subpixel tracking and measurements of tilt angles from north and northeast vIewpoints


All source video is available here:
http://the911forum.freeforums.org/early-movement-of-wtc1-made-simple-t346.html#p9513



Sauret viewpoint: Measurements of large antenna movement,

Large antenna drop for multiple points:

Over 200 frames
http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/1452/dropvstilt00007.png

Same with frames stretched
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/3524/dropvstilt00006.png

Same over 700 frames
http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/2940/dropvstilt00008.png


East tilt large antenna, measured by tracking the horizontal difference between 2 points on the antenna.
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/8246/easttilt.png

Features of the graph:
a) The earliest eastward tilt drift is detectable in frame -100 (or frame 70??)
b) The tilt measures about 0.3 degrees in frame 220
c) By frame 320 the tilt has not yet reached one degree


Evolution of east tilting of large antenna visualized (angle exaggerated)
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/328/easttilt.gif

Features of the east tilting of large antenna :
a) The data of the east tilt shows a gradual drift leaning of the antenna eastward, beginning more than 4 seconds before the first visible movement. Downward movement of the antenna begins in frame 155 and falling begins in frame 215. Notice how drift leaning to the east is detectable as early as frame -200.
b) The whole antenna is drifting eastward while it leans.

The same highlighting initiation frames only
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/2889/easttiltsiminit.gif
...................................

South tilt large antenna, measured by tracking the vertical difference and convergence of 2 points on the antenna.
http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/2149/nstilt.png

Features of the south tilt graph:
a) A south lean is first detected near frame 175
b) The antenna is leaning about 0.3 degrees to the south in frame 220 (it is later shown that the antenna starts to fall downward at a significant fraction of g in frame 220
c) The tilt reaches one degree in frame 295
d) By frame 320 the tilt has reached 2 degrees

For comparison, movement of stationary object in foreground
http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/2797/easttiltmetal.png
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Large antenna drop compared to east antenna drop
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/7726/twoantennas.png

..........................................

NE NBC viewpoint: Measurements of large antenna movement,

Angular movement of large antenna from NE, measured by tracking the horizontal difference between 2 points on the antenna
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/30/nemaxsouthtilt.png


Evolution of angular movement from NE viewpoint visualized (angle exaggerated)
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/9061/tilttimeline.gif

Features of the angular movement:
a) Between frame 165 and 217 the antenna tilted faster and reached about 0.75┬░. After frame 217 the tilting of the antenna stopped for the next 40 frames. During that time the antenna just shifted towards south while the north face (upper floors) apparently tilted more.
In the GIF above the x component of the movement is extremely stretched. Both axis are numbered each 10000 units. A thin blue line shows the position 10 frames ahead and a thin yellow line shows the position 10 frames before. The thin horizontal green lines show the measured antenna section. I extended the vertical lines to see at which elevation the "antenna" rotates (floor 98 is about at y=70000). It's obvious that the antenna started to descent at virtually 0┬░ tilting. At about 0.6┬░tilting the north face gave way and stopped further tilting for the next 40 frames.)
..................................

Comparison of north (Sauret) with NE (NBC) viewpoints: Large antenna angle
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/6851/neview.png



Created on 10/10/2010 08:41 PM by admin
Updated on 06/05/2011 06:27 PM by admin
 Printable Version

Copyright © 2008 WiredTech, LLC
phpWebSite is licensed under the GNU LGPL