Critical Review of 9/11 Blogger
9-11 Blogger has become the source for much daily news on the 9-11-01 attacks.
9-11 Blogger lists only 4 websites worldwide as being recommended inquiry sites:
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
Journal of 9/11 Studies
The first 3 sites present identical research information. The final listing does not offer technical research.
This means that 9-11 Blogger edits as if the technical research of STJ911 and AE911T is the only valid and significant research our planet has to offer.
This website examines the work of independent researchers and the work of organized groups like STJ911 and AE911T.
In truth, most every significant new discovery has been made by independent researchers. They are linked with other observations in menus on the left of the page.
These discoveries are ignored, while only information from AE911T and STJ911 is posted regularly. For this reason, 911 Blogger actually helps bury some of the best new research by systematically ignoring it.
In order to find the best new research, one has to ignore 911 Blogger and look elsewhere.
911 Blogger main sources of technical research
The large majority of technical research digested by the average reader of 9-11 Blogger is done by only a handful of individuals:
Niels Harret (recent, of microchip fame)
Notice how every one of these technical sources offers slightly different variations of one and the same opinion. They are essentially clones of one another. They echo and reinforce one another.
Unfortunately, more knowledgeable researchers are ignored unless they agree with this narrow, largely incorrect analysis offered by this small web of groups sharing identical viewpoints.
This is further evidence that the editorial process of 9-11 Blogger favors only a handful of researchers with one and the same viewpoint.
The wise reader knows that honest technical discussions cannot be pre-edited to fit only a single point of view. Hence 9-11 Blogger is a poor source of technical news, useless in its hopeless bias towards only one way of seeing current research.
9-11 Blogger as a promotional mouthpiece for STJ911 and AE911T
Promotion of one particular group of technical argunents leaves 9-11 Blogger vulnerable to poor argumention.
Weak arguments often pass unchallenged. Superior arguments offered on other websites are ignored if they do not conform with the claims of STJ911 and AE911T.
Tragically, STJ911 and AE911T offer very poor arguments for demoltion when compared to the state of current research. Therefore, 9-11 Blogger often promotes technical information that is false or misleading. While sophisticated arguments for demolition do exist, 9-11 Blogger will not allow them to be posted because they are viewed as "competition" to the largely incorrect arguments given by STJ911 and AE911T.
In this way 9-11 Blogger unwittingly serves as a censor of new research and discoveries far better than the ones they promote.
In this way it can be understood how coalescing around a small body of incorrect technical data can effectively kill active research.
Created on 03/08/2011 06:58 PM by admin
Updated on 03/16/2014 05:19 AM by admin