2.3 TOWARD AN ACCURATE MAPPING OF THE WTC1 COLLAPSE
WTC1 BUILDING MOVEMENT: INDEPENDENT MAPPING AND MEASUREMENTS OF THE EARLIEST DETECTABLE MOVEMENT THROUGH THE COLLAPSE INITIATION SEQUENCE
The collective visual record of the WTC1 collapse is examined directly and independently of all other sources, groups or individuals. The movement of the structure during the initial column failure sequence is mapped and traced back to the earliest point of detectable movement from multiple angles. Features of the initial failure sequence can be understood as a rapid succession of 9 identifiable events occurring in the following order:
1) Deformations: Inward bowing of the south face
2) Earliest detectable creep movement of the antenna and northwest corner 3) Appearance of first overpressurizations: ~87th fl S face ejections 4) Appearance second overpressurizations: 95th fl W face ejections
5) Visible downward movement begins: Columns fail over tilt of less than 1 degree, appearance of 98th fl ejections
6) Appearance of 77th fl W face ejections
7) Splitting of all perimeter walls: All visible upper parts fall out and over lower parts
8) Southward sliding of upper portion
9 ) Dis-integration of upper portion
All claims are verifiable and all methods are reproducible.
The area marked in red will be pulled inward about 55 inches in the next 24 minutes. Not only is there no sign of the inward bending at 9:58, but there are no visible fires in this location at this time.
9:59 3 large fireballs emerge from the middle and east side of the south perimeter as WTC2 starts to collapse. These locations mark the center of where IB will be visible after a few more minutes. Two clips which highlight the ejections:
The Sauret video is shown below. At 9.5 seconds before visible collapse the camera noticably shakes. This is when the slight movement of the antenna and northwest corner begin to be detected.
The first detectable motion begins just after the camera shakes in the video. The camera shake is clearly identifiable in both the video and the graph of the trace. From that moment, the pink and green lines tracking the antenna and upper northwest corner, respectively, begin to deviate from the static points.
The first 20 seconds are the original Sauret video.
1) The camera shakes about 9.5 seconds before collapse.
2) The antenna and the NW corner of the building begin to slowly move during or immediately after the camera shake.
Demonstration of subpixel tracking of a point on the antenna:
9 point tracking used to trace the movement of one round ball on the antenna.
PROOF OF EARLY MOVEMENT: Two approaches, same results.
The4 following short video clip demonstrates beyond doubt that overpressurizations from the 95th floor and the 92nd floor emerge before those along the 98th floor and before visible downward movement of the building. It is taken from the larger clip linked in phenomenon #3.
only after the emergence of the 87th floor south face ejections and the 95th and 92nd floor west face ejections does visible downward movement of the building begin.
5) VISIBLE DOWNWARD MOVEMENT BEGINS: DETERMINATION OF TILT OVER WHICH ALL COLUMNS INITIALLY FAIL. 98th floor pressurizations first appear.
The columns fail from south to north and from east to west so the clearly visible NW corner would be the last columns to fail. The moment of failure is shown:
By synchronizing the video from the northeast, north, northwest and west views, one can determine the moment the northwest corner fails by visual inspection. It can be easily verified that the northwest corner had already failed in the frames shown below:
A more precise determination of tilt angle:
Any capable person can determine tilt angles from various perspectives over which all columns fail by using a simple 4 step process:
A) Verify the west face fails from south to north:
B) Verify the north face fails from east to west:
C) Determine precise moment of failure of the northwest corner:
D) Measure tilt of antenna and other normally vertical features of the deforming structure from multiple angles at that moment
Steps 1 and 2 allow one to verify that the northwest corner is the last set of columns to fail. The precise moment of failure of the northwest corner can be determined by using the high resolution Sauret video and tracking the movement of the northwest corner:
The velocity curve in black allows the determination of the moment of failure of the NW corner with remarkable precision. One would naturally look at the point in which the velocity makes the initial sharp, downward transition. Both visual inspection and object tracking allow anyone to spot the moments of failure of the NW corner.
By synchronizing videos from other perspectives with the Sauret video from the north, tilt angles can be determined from each perspective.
Evolution of angular movement from NE viewpoint visualized (angle exaggerated)
Between frame 165 and 217, the rate of antenna tilting quickened and reached about 0.75°. After frame 217, the rate of tilting of the antenna stopped for the next 40 frames. During that time the antenna merely shifted southward while the north face (upper floors) seem to have tilted a bit more.
In the GIF above the x component of the movement is extremely stretched. Both axis are numbered each in 10000 units. A thin blue line shows the position 10 frames in the future and a thin yellow line shows the position 10 frames in the past. The thin horizontal green lines show the measured antenna section. The vertical lines are extended to see at which elevation the "antenna" collectively pivots (floor 98 is about at y=70000). It is obvious that the antenna started to descent at virtually 0° tilting. At about 0.6° tilting the north face gave way and stopped further tilting for the next 40 frames.
The same motion as seen from the west:
Within these observations are multiple indications of collective core failure. As will be shown in section 3.2, not one of these observations is recognized within the NIST reports. The author could understand that the official reports could overlook an observation or two, but consider the multiple indications of collective core failure:
Early antenna movement
Pull in of the NW corner
The upper portion of the south, west and north walls fail outside and over the lower portion
The actual measurement of tilt as the NW corner visibly fails
The upper portion detaches from the lower portion and slides southward at less than 1 degree tilt
There are multiple indicators of the same behavior. As will be demonstrated in section 3.2, none of which are mentioned within the NIST reports.
9) DIS-INTEGRATION OF THE UPPER PORTION
Zooms of these images reveal the upper south wall and a large section of the antenna have fallen out and over the lower south wall, shown here.
Fig _ Each perimeter wall can be divided into 3 regions separated by reinforced MER spandrels. Collapse progression proceeds down different regions at different rates. Image on right shows identifiable sections of the WTC1 west perimeter.
The debris for each building was found within and near the footprints and was pushed, or fanned outwards from the 4 exterior walls.
If WTC7 is ignored and only debris from WTC1 and 2 is considered, all debris exists in 8 natural regions as shown below.
Southward from WTC1 and westward from WTC2 share a region (called it "southwest complex") and eastward from WTC1 and northward from WTC2 share a region (the plaza area). Hence 8 natural regions total.
It is hoped that by rearranging all known useful debris photos by region, the reader can see for themselves how debris was distributed throughout the complex and in what condition without being overwhelmed with information.
The largest publicly available collection of debris photos are linked below:
Please notice how different this record of collapse progression movement is to that described by the NIST or Dr Bazant. This collapse record shows the specifics of highly ordered movement of the flooring, perimeter and core. This highly ordered process gives multiple indications of the most probable collapse mode of each tower: Progressive floor collapse as described in detail within section 2.1. Even though the information presented above is verifiable, there remains no accurate description of the collapse progression mode of the Twin Towers in any government, academic or professional literature to this day.
The NIST description and record of collapse initiation is also quite different from the movements and behavior extractable from the visual record. In this case, inward bowing is observed followed by the failure of all core and perimeter columns within a tilt angle of less than 1 degree.
The perimeter is responding to partial core failure. Therefore, the actual mechanism of collapse is partial core failure leading to collective core failure, while the perimeter deformations are merely the response to core failure.