Slideshow image

Since your web browser does not support JavaScript, here is a non-JavaScript version of the image slideshow:

slideshow image

slideshow image

slideshow image

slideshow image

slideshow image

Why Fact-check? Why preserve a visual record?

The Website Written as a Book
1: Science and Subjective Viewpoints
2: Toward Accurate Collapse Histories
....2.1: Progressive Floor Collapses in the WTC Towers
....2.2: General Global Characteristics of Collapses
....2.3: Mathematical Basis of ROOSD Propagation
....2.4: WTC1 Accurate Collapse History
....2.5: WTC2 Accurate Collapse History
....2.6: WTC7 Accurate Collapse History
3: WTC Collapse Misrepresentations
....3.1: Purpose of the NIST Reports
....3.2: NIST WTC1 Misrepresentations
....3.3: NIST WTC7 Misrepresentations
....3.4: NIST WTC2 Misrepresentations
....3.5: Reviewing the Purpose of NIST and FEMA Reports
....3.6: Bazant Misrepresentation of Collapse Progressions
....3.7: Block Misrepresentations of Collapse Progressions
....3.8: AE911T Misrepresentations of the Collapses
4: Scientific Institutions Can Be Unaware of Contradiction
5: Reassessing the Question of Demolition
....5.1: The Case of WTC1
....5.2: The Case of WTC2
....5.3: The Case of WTC7
6: WTC Collapse Records Studied as Meme Replication
....6.1: Meme Replication in Technical Literature
....6.2: Meme Replication in Mass Media
....6.3: Meme Replication in Popular Culture
....6.4: John Q Public and the WTC Collapse Records

WTC Twin Towers Collapse Dynamics

Official, Legal Attempts to Explain Collapses

Academic Attempts to Explain Collapses Reviewed

On the Limits of Science and Technology

WTC Video Record

WTC Photographic Record
WTC1 Attack to Collapse
WTC2 Attack to Collapse
Fire Progression, WTC1 North Face
Fire Progression, WTC1 South Face
Fire Progression, WTC1 East Face
Fire Progression, WTC1 West Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 North Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 South Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 East Face
Fire Progression, WTC2 West Face
Debris: WTC1 Around Footprint
Debris: WTC2 Around Footprint
Debris: From WTC1 Westward
Debris: From WTC1 Northward
Debris: From WTC2 Eastward
Debris: From WTC2 Southward
Debris: Plaza Area, Northeast Complex
Debris: Hilton Hotel, Southwest Complex
Debris: General, Unidentified Locations
Damage to Surrounding Buildings
Perimeter Column Photo Record
Perimeter Columns: Types of Damage
Core Box Columns: Types of Damage
Complete Photo Archive
Other Major 9-11 Photo Archives
The 911Dataset Project

WTC Structural Information

Log In


Remember Me

Online Misrepresentations of the WTC Collapses

Forum, Blog Representations of the WTC Collapses

The Book Tested Through Experiments

Miscellaneous Notes, Resources
FAQ for Miscellaneous Notes
History Commons 9/11 Timeline
The 911Dataset Project
Skyscraper Safety Campaign
First and Largest 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Key Words in Book and Website
Trapped Within a Narrowed False Choice
Vulnerability and Requestioning
On Memes and Memetics
Obedience, Conformity and Mental Structure
Denial, Avoidance (Taboo) and Mental Structure
Taboos Against Reviewing the Collapse Events
Extreme Situations and Mental Structure
Suggestibility, Hypnosis and Mental Structure
Awareness and Behavior
Magical, Religious, Scientific Cause-Effect Relations
The Extreme Limits of Mental Dysfunction
Orwell's "Crimestop", "Doublethink", "Blackwhite"
William James, Max Born: Science as Philosophy
Plato on Self Reflection and Mental Structure
Rewriting History, part 1
Rewriting History, part 2
On Smart Idiots

New Ideas in Education

Space Beams and "Dustification"

Space Beams and "Dustification"

The Arch-Absurd

You are being played with in the worst way.

Idiocy. What is there to say?

The amazing space beam theory by the renowned Dr Judy Wood serves as litmus test to catch the truly gullible. Only people who are capable of "believing" while making no effort at fact-checking and verification can fall for this.

The paper is located at the following link


Upon first reading the paper introducing this theory, which claims that a considerable mass of the WTC Twin Towers steel was "dustified", an even average reader may want to look for partially "dustified" steel beams among the rubble.

You will notice that there are none that you can find.

This means, according to her, that large core box columns and perimeter column-spandrel plate sections were either totally "dustified" or totally untouched, right to their perfectly squared-off ends.

It never seems to occur to Dr. Wood to maybe look at the debris to find evidence of vaporized or "dustified" steel. Perhaps she would want to show a partially "dustified" steel beam before making such stupid claims, no?

But who are we fooling?

This paper, tailor-made for a supermarket tabloid, was only written to make the 9-11 truth community look like idiots.

This is sensationalist disinfo, as opposed to the more advanced disinformation which Steven Jones craps into this world.

It was specifically designed to make us look "kooky", "nutty" and totally out of touch with physical reality.

But it was also carefully crafted to create a "puppet show" falling out with Steven Jones designed to make him look more "real".

And, sadly, it worked.

While it was refreshing to see that so many people didn't fall for this space beam garbage, so many people in the 9-11 truth community, desperate for a "hero scientist", latched onto Steven Jones like children clinging to the leg of their mommy.

During this staged puppet show between Dr. Wood and Dr. Jones, I, too, sympathized with the "rude" treatment of Steven Jones at the hands of the scholars organization and quickly joined the new organization Scholars for 9-11 Truth and Justice.

I did so to help Steven Jones with his own research. I have a scientific background and I thought that I could relieve some of the pressure on Dr. Jones by helping out. It was there that my correspondence with Steven Jones, through the stj911 forum, began.

Created on 11/12/2007 07:17 AM by admin
Updated on 12/04/2007 07:11 PM by admin
 Printable Version

Copyright © 2008 WiredTech, LLC
phpWebSite is licensed under the GNU LGPL